Of ‘Bloomberg’s War on Individual Freedom’

New York’s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has won his quest to ban the sale of very large cups of soda. In so doing, he’s assured himself a place in the pantheon of petty regulators. And yet, are these merely petty regulations? Jonathan Tobin thinks it’s something more, and so something worse:

America’s grand experiment with do-gooder government early in the 20th century was no less well intentioned than that undertaken by Bloomberg and his food and drink police. Indeed, the prohibition of the sale of alcohol addressed a far more urgent health problem facing the nation then (and now) as well as one that cost it, even in that era of small government, a lot of money. But Americans soon learned that legislating personal choices in such a manner is always a colossal mistake that tells us more about our faults than our virtues.

Personal choices, such as the consumption of sugar, do not fall under any reasonable definition of government responsibility. However serious our obesity problem may be, it cannot be solved by government fiat. Indeed, it isn’t likely that there will be a single less fat person in New York because of Bloomberg’s power play. But there will be a little less individual freedom in the city and elsewhere if his noxious idea spreads. The issue here is freedom, not sugar or obesity…Via Commentary Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *